Can HAARP manipulate storms, hurricanes, and earthquakes?

Can HAARP bring down aircraft?

There is definitely a correlation between these and when HAARP is active. While the signals along the ground are well-below adopted safety levels, the signals transmitted above the antenna array have sufficient strength to interfere with electronic equipment in aircraft flying nearby.

This is according to HAARP’s website.

Therefore, to ensure the safety of all flight operations in the vicinity of any HAARP system, the facilities are suppose to employ an aircraft alert radar (AAR) to automatically shut off HAARP X-Band transmissions when aircraft are detected either within or approaching a defined safety zone around the facilities. AAR didn’t automatically shut off HAARP and recently caused 2 aircrafts to crash in the matter of 2 weeks. One such crash occurred today after a HAARP transmission caused the flight instruments to malfunction on a plane carrying former former Sen. Ted Stevens, former NASA administrator Sean O’Keefe and ConocoPhillips CEO William “Bill” Phillips Sr. Evidence of when HAARP is activated is always presented by sudden changes in weather in the vicinity of a HAARP transmitter. CNN reported that bad weather delayed rescue in the Alaska crash for 12 hours. Even military planes dared not fly in while HAARP was transmitting. How does one know when HAARP is active? High frequency (HF) Spectrum Monitor Waterfall Charts can be and has been used to detect when HAARP is activated and to monitor HAARP transmissions to ensure adherence to FCC and NTIA requirements.

This article will give some examples of that correlation. And while that alone does not prove a direct causal relationship, the physics of HAARP and the political agenda behind the program suggest that weather and earthquake manipulation is both possible and likely.

With 3.6 megawatts of power at its command, HAARP is the most powerful ionospheric heater on the continental US. At its heart is a phased-array radar that emits radio waves that accelerate electrons in the Earth’s atmosphere causing it to ‘heat’ the Globe’s ionosphere. In simple terms, HAARP is responsible for accelerating Global warming. There isn’t just one HAARP. There are others, here are six:

1) Mu Radar – 1 megawatt facility in Japan (34°51′14.80”N 136° 6′19.45”E).

2) Arecibo Observatory – 2 megawatt facility in Puerto Rico (18°20′38.97”N 66°45′9.77”W).

3) HIPAS – 70 megawatt facility east of Fairbanks, Alaska (64°52′21.18”N 146°50′18.78”W).

4) Sura – 190 megawatt facility in central Russia (56° 7′10.32”N 46° 2′4.41”E).

5) EISCAT – 1 gigawatt facility in Tromsø, Northern Norway (69°35′1.06”N 19°12′57.11”E).

6) SBX-006 - a 2,000 ton Sea Based X-Band Radar Emitter stationed on a football field size pimped out mobile oil-drilling platform. The platform has six, 3.6 megawatt (21.6 megawatts capability) diesel generators. The X-Band is based in Alaska – at Adak Island but it roams throughout the Pacific Ocean.

By comparison, HAARP (near Gakona, Alaska – 62°23′33.73”N 145° 9′2.61”W) is claimed to be a mere 3.6 megawatt facility — and that’s after being upgraded in 2006. It has 278 times less maximum power than the ionospheric heater in Norway.

HAARP has many applications but its primary use is military. HAARP consists of phased arrays. A phased array is a grid of antennas whose phases (timing) and amplitudes are individually adjustable. This means a great variety of different combinations can be tried out, synthesizing new and complex total wave forms. Phasing allows the output to be pointed in different directions without having to move the antennas themselves. Phased arrays also allow for partial phase conjugation or canceling of the emitted electromagnetic waves. When EM waves have either (or both) of their electric and magnetic components cancelled, the contained energy takes the form of a longitudinal / potential / scalar / gravitational / temporal wave instead. Ionospheric heaters can also “control electron density gradients and the refractive properties in selected regions of the ionosphere” meaning it can modulate ionospheric electron density. That is another powerful method of generating longitudinal waves, using the sky itself as a giant longitudinal antenna.

And so phased arrays can be used to generate an entirely different type of radiation, one that cannot be detected with standard EM-measuring instruments. Depending on their frequency and type, these waves can theoretically affect human emotion and biology, influence the weather, alter tectonic dynamics, and even manipulate our surrounding hyper-dimensional environment to allow for controlled invisibility and interdimensional maneuvering of military personnel and vehicles. In essence, everything that regular electromagnetic waves cannot really do.

HAARP technologies are now active on a level superseding those of regular electromagnetism, and that this is what HAARP and its sister facilities are really being used for. It is nothing the public knows about or can comprehend because this technology uses an expanded kind of physics of which only a small and sterilized subset comprises mainstream college textbooks. But it can be figured out if you have a physics background and study the implications and applications of force-free potential fields.

Correlations between notable weather events and when HAARP was active.

HAARP’s activity can be easily detected using the waterfall chart published on the HAARP website. According to the site’s August 11, 2010 chart:

This chart is a waterfall plot of the readings taken by the Spectrum Monitor for the last 36 hours. The vertical axis is the frequency, ranging from 1 – 30 Mhz and the horizontal axis is the UTC time. Spectrum samples are taken every few minutes. The color indicates intensity of received signal at each frequency, ranging from deep blue for the weakest signals to red, yellow and white for the strongest signals.

HAARP activity is indicated by sharply defined patterns on the waterfall chart, like the slots on a piano roll or stripes on a spectrograph. There is also background noise in the charts, but those are more diffuse. What matters is the sharp patterns, their presence, sequence, when they start and stop.

Hurricane Katrina – August 23-30, 2005

The HAARP waterfall chart gives evidence that HAARP was highly active in the weeks before Katrina, during, and a short time after. If HAARP were inactive during that time, then it could be proven that it had absolutely nothing to do with Katrina, but since it was indeed active, a possible link existed. The two years following Katrina had very quiet hurricane seasons compared to what was predicted. The mild 2006 Atlantic hurricane season drew to a close without a single hurricane striking the United States — a stark contrast to the record-breaking 2005 season (HAARP very active) that killed more than 1,500 people and left thousands homeless along the Gulf Coast. The 2007 Atlantic hurricane season ended like 2006, failing to live up to the predictions of forecasters.

Hurricane Bertha

The storm formed just before Independence Day on July 3, 2008. The Daily Green reported that Bertha apparently developed from a tropical wave almost immediately as the disturbance came off the coast of Africa, and so became the most easterly forming July tropical storm known to us, as well as the most easterly forming Atlantic tropical storm period. As Bertha moved steadily westward, she intensified, first becoming a hurricane and then exploding into a powerful Category 3 major hurricane. At sunrise on July 7, 200 Bertha was Category 1, and within twelve short hours Bertha had grown into a Category 3 (possibly 4) hurricane. Something unusual happened just on that afternoon. On July 7 HAARP charts shows HAARP was active between 16:25 and 17:25 UTC — between 12:25 PM and 1:25 PM Eastern Time — on that same Monday afternoon when Bertha suddenly became Category 3. HAARP was not active before or after that event, and likewise Bertha was not as strong before or after. Bertha faded out afterwards. The correlation there is complete.

If HAARP was active during Hurricane Bertha, then the fact that it happened so quickly and nothing destructive ultimately came of it indicates a test or practice run. And with news of Bertha being a record-breaking hurricane foreshadowing an ominous hurricane season, the stage is set for other orchestrated disasters, considering current political and economic conditions.

Myanmar Cyclone and China’s 2008 Earthquake

Both the cyclone that hit Burma and the earthquake that struck China tightly coincided with the same HAARP activity period.

Cyclone Nargis was the worst natural disaster to hit Burma in recorded history, killing at least 85,000 people. The China earthquake led to the deaths of at least 80,000 people.

HAARP charts records activity beginning at 5:45 UTC on April 27, 2008. In the last week of April 2008, an area of deep convection persisted near a low-level circulation in the Bay of Bengal about 1150 km (715 mi) east-southeast of Chennai, India. On April 28 Nargis became nearly stationary while located between ridges to its northwest and southeast. That day the JTWC upgraded the storm to cyclone status, the equivalent of a minimal hurricane on the Saffir-Simpson hurricane scale. Early on April 29, the JTWC estimated Nargis reached winds of 160 km/h (100 mph), and at the same time the IMD classified the system as a very severe cyclonic storm. […] By late on April 29, convection had begun to rebuild, though immediate restrengthening was prevented by increased wind shear.

On May 1, after turning nearly due eastward, Cyclone Nargis began rapidly intensifying, due to greatly improved outflow in association with an approaching upper-level trough. Strengthening continued as it developed a well-defined eye with a diameter of 19 km (12 mi), and early on May 2 the JTWC estimated the cyclone reached peak winds of 215 km/h (135 mph) as it approached the coast of Burma, making it a category 4 storm.

Around 1200 UTC on May 2, Cyclone Nargis made landfall in the Ayeyarwady Division of Burma at peak strength. The storm gradually weakened as it procceded east over Burma, with its proximity to the Andaman Sea preventing rapid weakening. Its track turned to the northeast due to the approach of a mid-latitude trough to its northwest, passing just north of Yangon with winds of 130 km/h (80 mph).

Early on May 3 the IMD issued its final advisory on the storm. It quickly weakened after turning to the northeast toward the rugged terrain near the Burma-Thailand border, and after deteriorating to minimal tropical storm status, the JTWC issued its last advisory on Nargis. (Nargis Source - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cyclone_Nargis)

After Nargis, HAARP continued operating for another week. HAARP ceased activity at 22 UTC on May 11, 2008. The China earthquake struck a little more than eight hours later at 6:28 UTC on May 12. In the days and minutes before the quake, there were reports of strange phenomena including bizarre toad behavior and iridescent clouds. Earthquakes are typically “in the works” days or weeks before going off, and animals, sensitive people, and scalar detectors can sense the nonphysical precursors to these quakes.

One has to wonder, if earthquakes generate and are preceded by scalar waves, could scalar waves likewise trigger earthquakes? If so, the phased array of HAARP is capable of doing this for political and military purposes. The quake was certainly convenient for western military factions:

Earthquake Destroyed China’s Largest Military Armory 8 hours after HAARP turned off

The Chinese military disclosed that the May 12, 2008 earthquake in Sichuan Province caused a chain-reaction of explosions in the Sichuan mountain areas. The explosions destroyed Chinese army’s largest armory, new weapon test bases and part of nuclear facilities including several nuclear warheads. After carefully analyzing seismic data, military experts in southeast Asia confirmed a non-geological shock had occurred at the earthquake epicenter. The energy released was equivalent to that of an underground nuclear explosion.

There is not enough actual energy being outputted by HAARP to directly power an earthquake, but HAARP systems don’t need that much power if they merely act as nonlinear imbalancers, triggers, or redirectors of existing large natural energy flows.

Was the earthquake just a random natural event? Or was it strategically and intentionally created? These earthquakes, hurricanes and plane crashes are not mere coincidence. The correlation between HAARP, Earthquakes, Hurricanes and plane crashes has been proven with HAARP’s own data charts. The only coincidences are these:

* The official death toll of the May 12, 2008 Earthquake was 80,000.
* HAARP was shut off 8 hours before the quake struck.
* The Earthquake was of magnitude 8.0.
* The earthquake occurred exactly 88 days before the Beijing Olympics.
* The Olympics will begin on 8/8/08 at 8:08 PM.

------------------------------------

Global Research, July 28, 2010
Strategic Culture Foundation
The abnormally hot weather in the central regions of Russia has already caused serious economic damage. It has destroyed crops on roughly 20% of the country's agricultural land lots, the result being that the food prices are clearly set to climb next fall. On top of that, fires are raging over peat lands around Moscow. These days, the majority of forecasts concerning the climate are alarming: droughts, hurricanes, and floods are going to be increasingly frequent and severe. Director of the climate and energy program of the Wildlife Fund A. Kokorin says that the current trend is not a random phenomenon and should not be expected to subside (1).

In this particular context, the credibility of projections emanating from the Wildlife Fund, an influential international organization running worldwide operations styled as environment-protection programs, is beyond question (2). The reason is that the global warming which is the subject of heated academic (or, occasionally, absolutely unscholarly) debates is not necessarily an uncontrolled process. At least, the incidence of the current anomalously high temperatures exclusively in Russia and some adjacent territories invites alternative explanations.

Back in the 1970ies, Z. Brzezinski invoked in his Between Two Ages the theme of weather control, which he regarded as a form of broader social regulation. No doubt, the heavyweight of the US geopolitical thinking had to take interest not only in the immediate social but also in the potential geopolitical implications of influencing the climate. He was not the only author to probe into the issue but, due to obvious regards, information on the progress in the sphere of climate weaponry is unlikely to spill over secrecy barriers in the foreseeable future.

M. Chossudovsky, an economics professor from the Ottawa University, wrote in 2000 that in part the ongoing climate change could be triggered by the use of new-generation nonlethal weapons. The US is certainly exploring the possibilities of controlling the climate in several regions of the world. The corresponding technology is being developed in the framework of the High-Frequency Active Aural Research Program» (HAARP) (3), the objective being to build a potential to launch droughts, hurricanes, floods, and earthquakes. From the military standpoint, HAARP is supposed to create a novel type of weapons of mass destruction and an instrument of expansionist policy which can be used to selectively destabilize environmental and agricultural systems of target countries (4). Technically, the system is known to be a set of sources of electromagnetic radiation affecting the ionosphere. It comprises 360 sources and 180 aerials having the height of 22 meters (5). Altogether the station emits 3,600 kW towards the ionosphere, being the world's most powerful system of the kind(6). The program opened in 1990, is jointly funded by the US Office of Naval Research and the US Air Force Research Laboratory, and is implemented by several university laboratories.

Far-reaching hypotheses arise naturally in the situation. Venezuelan leader H. Chavez was ridiculed for attributing the Haiti earthquake to the impact of HAARP but, for example, similar suspicions crept in following the 2008 earthquake in China's Sichuan province. Moreover, there is evidence that the US climate influence program not only spans a number of countries and regions but is also partially based in space. For instance, the X-37B unmanned vehicle orbited on April 22, 2010 reportedly carries new types of laser weaponry. According to New York Times, the Pentagon rejects any connection between X-37B and whatever combat weapons but recognizes that its purpose is to support ground operations and to handle a number of auxiliary tasks (7). The vehicle was built 11 years ago as a part of a NASA program which was taken over by the US Air Force 6 years ago and completely classified (8).

Demands to unveil details of the experimental program put into practice in Alaska are voiced both in the US and in several other countries. Russia never joined the chorus, but the impression is that efforts aimed at deliberate climate change are not a myth, and that in the nearest future Russia – together with the rest of the world – will face a new generation of threats. At the moment the climate weapons may be reaching their target capacity and used to provoke droughts, to erase crops, and to induce various anomalous phenomena in certain countries.


Source: NASA